![]() Unless there is some kind of law or requirement by governments for digital imaging programs, indicating that if they include this functionality, then they can sell to the government. It shouldn’t be doing ANY image recognition except (debatably) at the final output point, that is, printing. At 70% or greater, it gets flagged – just guessing and making up numbers to illustrate the point. It may look for five markers, each having to have five specific characteristics. Well, in truth we don’t know the criteria. Maybe that section that contains the "marker" is not distorted maybe that section that contains the "marker" is not distorted. It’s "flagged" as a nonuse item, regardless of whether it’s wavy or not. And I’m not liking the conclusions I’m coming up with. I’m not taking the piss out of you – just suggesting that folk think about what’s going on here! Is that your point? Apparently ps does too. Now in that context think about just how stupid that statement is – think hard – real hard – if you can’t think then open your wallet and check a $20 bill. Do YOU think PS should be doing image recognition, and if so, should it be doing it at the point it is?ĭave, it’s about YOU reproducing. I don’t know where you’re going (or are trying to lead me). And since PS or adobe doesn’t know what teh final image may be, then the error should be at the end of the pipe line if still the illegality is still thereĭo you think Photoshop is so smart that it can tell a real $20 bill from a copy?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |